Declare Books In Favor Of Politics

Original Title: Πολιτικά
ISBN: 0486414248 (ISBN13: 9780486414249)
Edition Language: English
Books Politics Free Download
Politics Paperback | Pages: 368 pages
Rating: 3.95 | 30079 Users | 469 Reviews

Mention Based On Books Politics

Title:Politics
Author:Aristotle
Book Format:Paperback
Book Edition:thrift
Pages:Pages: 368 pages
Published:November 15th 2000 by Dover Publications (first published -350)
Categories:Philosophy. Politics. Classics. Nonfiction. History. Political Science. Literature. Ancient

Explanation Toward Books Politics

What is the relationship of the individual to the state? What is the ideal state, and how can it bring about the most desirable life for its citizens? What sort of education should it provide? What is the purpose of amassing wealth? These are some of the questions Aristotle attempts to answer in one of the most intellectually stimulating works. Both heavily influenced by and critical of Plato's Republic and Laws, Politics represents the distillation of a lifetime of thought and observation. "Encyclopaedic knowledge has never, before or since, gone hand in hand with a logic so masculine or with speculation so profound," says H. W. C. Davis in his introduction. Students, teachers, and scholars will welcome this inexpensive new edition of the Benjamin Jowett translation, as will all readers interested in Greek thought, political theory, and depictions of the ideal state.

Rating Based On Books Politics
Ratings: 3.95 From 30079 Users | 469 Reviews

Article Based On Books Politics
Evaluating my experience with the book, without daring to say that Aristotle was anything less than a five star intellect.

To anyone who is interested in this book: make sure you read Ethics first.This is the first Aristotle I have read and I have more questions than opinions. It might turn out that this review is a total stupidity but -- I've done worse (plus I'm a heartless bitch). So here we go.0) The nicknames "divine Plato and daemonic Aristotle".I heard this notion from Leo Strauss in his lecture on Symposium and I kept wondering what this could mean. Still have no idea what it could mean -- that Plato is as

This is quite a turn away from the optimistic "we can figure it all out" tone of the Nicomachean Ethics. In trying to confront both what a state is and how it functions, he creates this weird/insidious master/slave hierarchy, expanding it to encompass children, women, basically anyone who isn't a member of the Athenian aristocracy. While this in and of itself isn't really shocking considering how the typical greek polis maintained and grew it's own power (i.e. going to war, stealing women, land

As Platos writings have been a cornerstone of Western thought, so have those of his pupil Aristotle through his own lectures and treatise sometimes agreed and disagreed with his teacher while shaping the views of millions over the millennia. Politics is one of the most important political treatise that has impacted society as it is studied alongside Platos own Republic not because they agree, but how they agree through different methods and disagree in conclusions.Unlike the approach of Plato,

There are so many consequential ideas in this book that it's amazing it's not required reading in Western classrooms anymore. The Benjamin Jowett translation is easily accessible in many formats. Perhaps just as it was "lost" to the Middle Ages until "rediscovered" and translated into Latin in the 12th century it is lost to today.Prerequisites for reading this book are Plato's Republic and The Laws, of which I read the former. The Republic is the more important as Aristotle spends much time

Quite possibly one of the worst books I've read in recent memory. It was actually painful trying to finish reading this book. Aristotle's words are obtuse, his arguments vague and it all just makes me want to fall asleep (I have actually fallen asleep numerous times while reading this book due to sheer boredom and uninterest). I'm sure there is troves of important information among these pages of gobbledygook, but I think Aristotle was just too galaxy brained for it to be comprehensible to the

What is "politics"? Is it a natural vocation for man? These questions deserve to be asked at a time when observers are making individualism and disaffection for the public good the characteristics of contemporary societies. The answer of Aristotle comes to us from another time, but will help us to better understand ours and what it misses perhaps. Society and its political organization are not for the author of La Politique a historical invention which has become necessary by the force of habit.